6 ms·
This is an important point. It looks like they didn’t directly make any measurements of vision, just biological markers of corneal health. That doesn’t mean th
by Chance-Device 2y ago
This is an important point. It looks like they didn’t directly make any measurements of vision, just biological markers of corneal health.
That doesn’t mean that vision didn’t improve. It’s just a bit odd that if it did, they wouldn’t have quantified it and added that to this paper.
- momento 2y agoIf you read the article, they clearly test vision in the patients. >the majority of patients regained some sight, with some advancing from legally blind to low vision.