4 ms·
While this is true... the significant factor here is that these children are saving. If there were no saving, the money would have been spent/stolen/taken almo
by inexplicable 14y ago
While this is true... the significant factor here is that these children are saving.
If there were no saving, the money would have been spent/stolen/taken almost for certain. I can understand the feeling of the boy who saved ₹4000 in 7 months. Given the living standards and challenges these children face, it would have impossible to have even a quarter of that left over in 7 months.
Edit: added the rupee symbol
- praxulus 14y agoI'm definitely not saying they shouldn't be saving. The (now deleted) comment I replied to was awed by the high savings rate the kids were getting, 5%. I was just putting it in perspective.