5 ms·
The main thrust of the argument has little to do with dietary choice, and far more to do with the negative footprint of factory farming. Factory farming is a s
by nickler 14y ago
The main thrust of the argument has little to do with dietary choice, and far more to do with the negative footprint of factory farming.
Factory farming is a significant contributor to many negatives in the environment. Methane, fertilizers and hormones/chemicals that seep into groundwater, fresh water usage, and transportation are massive contributors to environmental damage.
Disclaimer: I'm a chef, I love meat, and I'm descended from farmers. I still believe this is the future, once someone nails the texture/flavour issue. I've been looking into in-vitro meat, but it still looks a ways off http://new-harvest.org/substitutes.htm http://new-harvest.org/substitutes.htm
Being able to manipulate the fat content and marbling, re-introduce heirloom breeds, and all produced with a fraction of the footprint makes this a delicious opportunity.
The real question is the length of the roadmap, it's been decades that people have been working on this.