5 ms·
It makes sense why it can't be _removed_... it's required for core OS interaction features such as a known-working login portal framework and probably tons of o
by mjevans 2y ago
It makes sense why it can't be _removed_... it's required for core OS interaction features such as a known-working login portal framework and probably tons of other 'reuse the rendering engine from the browser to display stuff' portions of the shell and settings pages.
If you wanted to de-google your phone _that_ much it probably requires a custom firmware blob that's shipped with a different browser... if that's even possible / reasonable.
- figmert 2y agoIt's not really required. Android comes with a separate webview (that cannot be overridden). Sure it's based on Chromium but that means there should zero reliance on Chrome the product, and those known working login portals can continue working without Chrome. It's well known that Google requires manufacturers to install their apps and requires it to be uninstallable. This includes Gmail, Google, and others.
- homebrewer 2y ago> that cannot be overridden I thought I knew better, because the webview implementation can be changed in the system preferences, but (of course) the list of package names that can appear there is hardcoded: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/HEAD/android_webview/docs/webview-providers.md#package-name https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/HEAD/androi...
- malinens 2y agoI live with firefox mobile engine for webview without any issue
- chupasaurus 2y agoGeckoView cannot replace built-in WebView [0]. [0] https://wiki.mozilla.org/Mobile/GeckoView https://wiki.mozilla.org/Mobile/GeckoView