The reason we denounce it is that it's *always* an attempt to get the camel's nose in. Just look at the article--politicians admitting their intent! And the r

The reason we denounce it is that it's *always* an attempt to get the camel's nose in. Just look at the article--politicians admitting their intent! And the reality is as always it's focusing on the wrong "threat". Like the vast majority of sexual abuse is by trusted people in the kid's life, not by anything on the web. The real threats on the web are social media and chat rooms, not the "naughty" stuff. Or look at the perennial attempts to allow governments to block "child sexual abuse images"--since it's always done with hashes there's no verification that that's all they're doing. Think China wouldn't block images of tank man in Tienanmen Square?