3 ms·
To be clear, Target had to pay a lot of money to disagree about what U.S. law requires. It would have been cheaper to fix their accessibility bugs and even chea
by extra88 2y ago
To be clear, Target had to pay a lot of money to disagree about what U.S. law requires. It would have been cheaper to fix their accessibility bugs and even cheaper to build with accessibility in mind in the first place.
- grayhatter 2y agoIt absolutely would have been cheaper! But cheaper or not, target still should have. There's no ethical reason for a large corporate website to be inaccessible.