2 ms·
But if that's a good thing or a bad thing should be reserved, exclusively for you to decide. Target had to pay $6,000,000 because of accessibility problems wit
by reaperducer 2y ago
But if that's a good thing or a bad thing should be reserved, exclusively for you to decide.
Target had to pay $6,000,000 because of accessibility problems with its web site.
I sure hope you're not in a position to make decisions about your company's web site.
- extra88 2y agoTo be clear, Target had to pay a lot of money to disagree about what U.S. law requires. It would have been cheaper to fix their accessibility bugs and even cheaper to build with accessibility in mind in the first place.
- grayhatter 2y agoIt absolutely would have been cheaper! But cheaper or not, target still should have. There's no ethical reason for a large corporate website to be inaccessible.
- grayhatter 2y ago> There are people who will never be able to understand you, and there will be people who choose to misunderstand you. I appreciate in your haste to be mad about something, you helped me prove my point. I was talking about places where you'd reasonably prefer artistic expression, not large corporate websites. Given different circumstances, I would make different decisions.