> You are accusing him of a new crime. I am doing no such thing. I have no idea if he committed a crime. I am not litigating anything. He did an interview with

> You are accusing him of a new crime. I am doing no such thing. I have no idea if he committed a crime. I am not litigating anything. He did an interview without getting permission, breaking the rules of his confinement. That’s obvious, since the interview aired. I don’t need to litigate it, and I’m not attempting to. > Prisoners are still afforded their constitutional rights. No, they aren’t; this is plainly untrue. They are afforded some of their constitutional rights, but not all of them. While prisoners do not enjoy full constitutional rights, they do receive 8th Amendment protection from cruel and unusual punishment. For example, the Supreme Court ruled that California jails must abide by the court-mandated population limits to prevent overpopulation, and thus affording inmates a minimum standard of living in Brown v. Plata. There are some other rights, like due process, protection under the 14th amendment from discrimination and unequal treatment based solely on their race, sex, or creed, etc. Lastly, incarcerated individuals are guaranteed the right to religion and free speech as long as their status as prisoners does not interfere with these protected rights. Please educate yourself: https://www.jailhouselaw.org/your-rights-prison https://www.jailhouselaw.org/your-rights-prison Prisoners do not have all their constitutional rights. If your argument is that they should, then that’s a different discussion.