Humans are susceptible to cascading runaway "ethical" failures. I'm thinking the $2 billion UBS loss. Humans also don't scale very well so risk tends to be dist

Humans are susceptible to cascading runaway "ethical" failures. I'm thinking the $2 billion UBS loss. Humans also don't scale very well so risk tends to be distributed across several of us. Perhaps robots should be setup in the same way; that there are several of them with different algorithms tuned for different levels of risk... or perhaps it really doesn't matter all that much because this is one firm and not the entire system so the risk is already distributed correctly.