2 ms·
I think the control should be in the hands of the public. Stewarded by a public organization with government funds. What do you think?
by keepamovin 2y ago
I think the control should be in the hands of the public. Stewarded by a public organization with government funds. What do you think?
- creato 2y agoGood luck paying engineers to work on chrome on the GS pay scale, subject to the whims of Elon Musk's DOGE.
- acdha 2y agoI think you’d have had zero problems having engineers on the GS scale prior to November 6th, 2024. No, they wouldn’t get rich but it’s a space full of interesting technical and usability challenges and you’d be able to work on incredibly high-impact open source projects. Like if you simply make it easier for someone older/disabled/etc. to fill out forms, make good security decisions, find information, etc. literally millions of people benefit from that a couple of weeks later. It’d be neat if the EU picked up the torch here but with any government it seems like it’d be better to have a non-profit get a block grant so you avoid things like those salary issues or other challenges: for example, if the EU decided they didn’t want to depend on the U.S. for critical infrastructure, funding a back-to-its-roots Mozilla.org would make it easier for, say, Canada or India to join in without the issues you’d have trying to directly pay government employee salaries.
- keepamovin 2y agoHehehe - government funding doesn't mean government in charge. Maybe they only bootstrap it. The right structure is possible.
- robertlagrant 2y ago> I think the control should be in the hands of the public. Stewarded by a public organization with government funds. What do you think? I don't know. I think today the EU could set up EUBrowser, a fork of Chromium, and start work. Almost all the hard work has been done by OSS contributions. Google engineers, and Google-funded things such as Firefox. They could live off that comfortably while providing a more locked-down browser if they liked. A more meaningful, less parasitic option would take longer: the EU (or whomoever) writes a browser from scratch. Then they could decide exactly what goes into it, and have independent input into standards etc.
- keepamovin 2y agoI like both these ideas. But feel the first more destined for success.