Cowboy critiques start in the 4th paragraph, not the penultimate. Could even say the 2nd though not by name yet, so let's say 4th. 1st: Intro. Does lean cowboy

Cowboy critiques start in the 4th paragraph, not the penultimate. Could even say the 2nd though not by name yet, so let's say 4th. 1st: Intro. Does lean cowboy, admiring what a cowboy does while merely stating what a system does. drone +0.5 cowboy +1 2nd: Positive aspects of systems. Doesn't mention cowboys by name but last sentence does describe negative effect of cowboy by saying "not that". drone +1 3rd: Positive aspects of cowboy. Notably shorter than 2nd. cowboy +1 4th: Negatives of both drone & cowboy. Why each does not respect the other, from the individuals perspective. drone -1 cowboy -1 5th: Positives of both from a small business owner perspective. drone +1 cowboy +1 6th: Cowboy incompatiblity with growth. cowboy -1 7th: Summary, positives of both, negatives of both, both are necessary to some degree at dofferent times in different contexts. drone -1+1 cowboy -1+1 total drone +1.5 cowboy +1 Huh, Cowboy actually gets an entire paragraph dedicated to nothing but the negatives of cowboy (6th), and no matching paragraph dedicated to nothing but the negatives of systems. Even the intro leaning cowboy positive doesn't cancel 6th out since it's not dedicated to negatives of systems, it only says positive things of both, but is more positive to cowboy. And everything else cancels out. In total, it's actually more critical of cowboys than systems.