5 ms·
Honestly yeah It's an artificial benchmark that means nothing in production Also the article does not bring much to the table except of python whining "Oh th
by raverbashing 2y ago
Honestly yeah
It's an artificial benchmark that means nothing in production
Also the article does not bring much to the table except of python whining
"Oh the Go dockerfile is smaller" Yes you compiled it and is running a binary. Big woop. Funny how the author not doing the same comparison with node
- ashishb 2y ago> "Oh the Go dockerfile is smaller" Yes you compiled it and is running a binary. Big woop. Funny how the author not doing the same comparison with node If I did that with Node, you would say what about Ruby. If I did that with Ruby, you would say what about Zig. There is no end to the list of languages. > It's an artificial benchmark that means nothing in production It was a cover illustration, I did not mention that at all. In fact, I demonstrated the resource consumption of Python's docker image. If you have suggestions to make the Python one, I am all ears.
- raverbashing 2y ago> If I did that with Node, you would say what about Ruby. No, because the comparison here is runtimes of interpreted languages Comparing a compiled binary to the python/node/ruby runtime is comparing Apples to Oranges
- ashishb 2y agoWhy do I have to restrict myself to interpreted languages only?