3 ms·
True but misses the point - surely quantity matters? A machine that can do 0.001% of basic tasks vs. one that can do 20% of basic tasks seems qualitatively diff
by highfrequency 2y ago
True but misses the point - surely quantity matters? A machine that can do 0.001% of basic tasks vs. one that can do 20% of basic tasks seems qualitatively different.
- lblume 2y agoHow to classify that fraction? Let's say D. Gukesh (current chess champion) plays and learns chess for 50% of his time awake. Would you consider Stockfish to be a superintelligence that accounts for 50% of basic task wrt D. Gukesh? What if tasks (like some types of entertainment) usually are not relevantly attributed to intelligence at all? I would love to find answers to the questions but find them difficult to the point of being too vague to answer.