4 ms·

Can it code? Because after seeing webpages be altered with misinformation/BIAS, AI hallucinate, wikipedia 'moderators' put literal lies on pages and lock the pa

Can it code? Because after seeing webpages be altered with misinformation/BIAS, AI hallucinate, wikipedia 'moderators' put literal lies on pages and lock the pages from being edited based on their own power hunger and emotions.. none of this surprises me. Check out the real history of Christopher Columbus, who not only didn't discover America, but slaughtered everybody, and the history was given as migrants came to America and it sounded better when an author wrote whatever sounded better than what actually happened in a book so they just adopted that it would be the new history, and they-- being the leaders of the United States at the time. History gets amnesia. People forget. They don't care. As children, they're 'taught' that 'this is what happened' and 'this is how it is' and 'this is how you must think for yourselves' and as we grow older we must learn and unlearn and keep doing that as we go while fighting the urge to bitch about things running circles going nowhere. Humans infected AI tools. Solve that problem, you'll solve some 'Moscow' problem.

toofy 2y ago
the fact that we’ve sometimes been misled on history should teach us to not do that again. to reach closer towards the truth. the answer is that both of those instances in your example should be called out. the answer is not “whatabout $other_instance happening, therefore it’s magically ok.”
- from-nibly 2y ago
  It's not that it's OK, it's that it isn't an AI problem. It's about framing. "People lie", isn't a good headline. "$bad_guy $negative_hyperbolic_verb $current_hype" is much better. How about The US infected deepseek with US propaganda. The neighbors destroyed our street with leaving their trashcan on the street My brother trainwrecked my dinner by eating all the fries None of these problems are actually about the indirect object. They are people problems.

toofy 2y ago

the fact that we’ve sometimes been misled on history should teach us to not do that again. to reach closer towards the truth. the answer is that both of those instances in your example should be called out. the answer is not “whatabout $other_instance happening, therefore it’s magically ok.”

from-nibly 2y ago
It's not that it's OK, it's that it isn't an AI problem. It's about framing. "People lie", isn't a good headline. "$bad_guy $negative_hyperbolic_verb $current_hype" is much better. How about The US infected deepseek with US propaganda. The neighbors destroyed our street with leaving their trashcan on the street My brother trainwrecked my dinner by eating all the fries None of these problems are actually about the indirect object. They are people problems.