2 ms·
You're implying smart 17 year olds don't make it into bars. You rarely need anything approaching %100 compliance in order to have an effective policy, so if an
by burnished 2y ago
You're implying smart 17 year olds don't make it into bars.
You rarely need anything approaching %100 compliance in order to have an effective policy, so if anything you're advocating for its effectiveness when you suggest the only people that would be in violation are the rare precocious kid.
- AnthonyMouse 2y agoBut that's the difference. For a 17 year old to get into a bar, they need to, themselves, acquire a fake ID. Anyone selling that physical object in your jurisdiction would then be subject to arrest. On the internet, one smart 17 year old sets up im-old.lol and then every kid everywhere has a one-click age verification bypass and the service is run by an anon on a server outside the jurisdiction.
- baby_souffle 2y ago> You're implying smart 17 year olds don't make it into bars. Sarcastically, yes :). It's a reference to the "you must be over 18/21 to enter this porn/alcohol site" banners. Even a "smart" 17 year old will figure the banner out.