3 ms·
> "Claude is simply much better." Until lots of free AI models close the gap again. It is simply not good enough for such valuations like this for Anthropic.
by rvz 2y ago
> "Claude is simply much better."
Until lots of free AI models close the gap again. It is simply not good enough for such valuations like this for Anthropic.
Any other valuation higher than 70B for Anthropic is really overvalued and such higher valuations are always defended by those who invested in it already.
- Karrot_Kream 2y agoA few friends and I run Deepseek (and other LLMs) on some hardware we jointly own and offer endpoints to each other via VPN. Deepseek is a big step forward for open LLMs and is something I use when writing scripts that process lots of data because we've all split the capital to build the machine, but Claude was and still is a lot better than Deepseek in the kinds of day-to-day usage that I'm after. And with how cheap Gemini 2.0 is, I find myself considering whether to use my local LLMs even for data analysis. I realize that on benchmarks it appears R1 is very close to Sonnet 3.7, but in practice I use Sonnet 3.7 much more.