4 ms·

It is frightening how extremely politicized and wasteful all the science management has become in a shockingly short amount of time. The US is setting their en

It is frightening how extremely politicized and wasteful all the science management has become in a shockingly short amount of time. The US is setting their entire science infrastructure on fire, leaving a massive opening for Europe, the UK, and especially China to take over. And the US does not consider any of those countries allies. It's baffling to imagine why this is happening unless those in control are actually actively working on foreign orders to weaken the US and its future.

ujkhsjkdhf234 2y ago
> It's baffling to imagine why this is happening unless those in control are actually actively working on foreign orders to weaken the US and its future. This is exactly what is happening. I feel like people have to be deliberating ignoring all the evidence that Elon and Trump are foreign assets at this point. It has been obvious for years and only more obvious with time.
- jfengel 2y ago
  As insane as all of this is, I still have a hard time believing that they're foreign assets. They are doing what Trump was elected to do. The voters aren't Russian assets. Certainly the Russians have been doing their best to dis-inform the voters, but that doesn't need to come from the top. And they are largely doing it by parroting the standard Republican talking points for the last four decades. The Russians are, at most, exacerbating what they already wanted to believe. If anything, that's worse. They're not assets. They're doing this because they're genuine believers.
  - epistasis 2y ago
    But where do those voters get their beliefs? Who controls their information space, and who is injecting ideas? This is classic Russian strategy all over the world, and they are experts at the psychology and how to control parts of the population through division of that population. This might in fact be the only innovation that Russia can claim since the fall of the USSR: complete mastery of the technology of propaganda for controlling populations.
    - rayiner 2y ago
      > But where do those voters get their beliefs? Conservatives have been threatening to drown the federal government in the bathtub since the 1980s. There’s no new beliefs. It’s just a reshuffling between the parties of the same folks that existed in 1990: paleocons and social conservatives, capitalists, neocons, nationalists, economic populists, etc. The anti-vaxxers were there, they were just democrats because that was the low-institutional-trust party back then. The people you’re calling “Russian agents” were also there in the 1990s, as were the neocons calling them that. They just took over the GOP because it turned out that the Democrats (back then) were correct and american military intervention in places Iowans can’t find in a map is actually bad for the GOP base.
      - scrollaway 2y ago
        It’s only true out of convenience. Russian propaganda latched onto various divisive talking points and pushed them to the extremes. I’m old enough to remember conservative republicans from 2008 ish era and while there was some dumb stuff, anything 2016 and beyond is unparalleled and its revisionist to say otherwise. The American public got slowly acclimated to turning into a ridiculous version of idiocracy. A mix of corrupt / easily bought politicians, a voter base addicted to consumerism and social media, and a country with a problematic voting system, all contributed to todays situation. I used to wonder, like many kids, “why didn’t anyone stop hitler, he was so obviously bad”. It was never that obvious to me that so many other indoctrinated people could have been just as awful and far gone. I pray those smart enough to see where all of this is inevitably leading to, leave the US before it’s too late for them to. Do not become an unwilling contributor to what the US does next.
        silverquiet 2y ago
        > I’m old enough to remember conservative republicans from 2008 ish era and while there was some dumb stuff, anything 2016 and beyond is unparalleled and its revisionist to say otherwise. "Idiocracy" came out in 2006, and Carl Sagan was writing about American anti-intellectualism long before that. I'd also note that 2008 brought us Sarah Palin on the Republican ticket. I agree things were better, but the rot was clear to some already.
  - watwut 2y ago
    It is funny how Trump was elected to destroy America, but also if you blame republican voters you are unfair, because they supposedly had no idea. Trump was elected to raise inflation, make markets unstable, waste money on conspiracy theory research?
  - hayst4ck 2y ago
    Why do politicians ask for money? Because money influences votes. How does money influence votes? Money pays for private intelligence companies, PR firms, think tanks, and social media influence. What does this mean? It means that politicians are influencing the voter base, rather than the voter base influence politicians. What is the corollary of all this? A foreign government can influence American voters either via more direct means (such as running a private intelligence company) or indirect means (offering resources in exchange for favors). Is there precedent? Yes. America institutes regime change in other countries in many ways. France funded and offered aid to the pre-american rebellion against British rule resulting in the formation of a new state. At some point people stop being individual actors and become statistics. It might be even more correct to say people are in A/B testing groups and there are engineers literally experimenting on these groups to achieve an outcome for the purposes of whoever paid them.
  - tzs 2y ago
    > As insane as all of this is, I still have a hard time believing that they're foreign assets. They are doing what Trump was elected to do. I don't recall most of the things going on now coming up during the campaign, so I don't see how you can conclude he was elected to do them. He was elected to do the things that he spent 95% of his campaign time on.
- dartos 2y ago
  The best argument I’ve seen in favor of your position is “If they were working with foreign powers to weaken the US, what would they be doing differently”
- nosianu 2y ago
  I don't believe it. Everything they did and achieved required a huge organization and a lot of influential sponsors. It should raise even more alarms how thus far every single critic of them even inside their own party was silenced or actually joined them! I don't believe in threats as explanation on that scale. Many of those people are themselves well connected and influential. I fear there is something deeper going on, and we will only find out by watching. I hate this narrative that concentrates on Trump, or even Musk. Neither would be where they are now with a huge amount of active support. Whatever is happening is coming from inside the US. They may also be working together with foreign actors, but they act according to their own interests.
  - ujkhsjkdhf234 2y ago
    Billionaires are pooling their resources to chop the US into network states. That is what is happening.
Joel_Mckay 2y ago
"US is setting their entire science infrastructure on fire" Dubious journals created to serve political narratives are common in every country ( https://beallslist.net/ https://beallslist.net/ .) Throw enough money at any issue, and one may engineer influence in public media outlets just like any regular Ad/Review spot. It is not a new phenomena, have a wonderful day =3
- sanktanglia 2y ago
  Except alot more is happening in America then just dubious journals like mass firing of scientists and experts
  - Joel_Mckay 2y ago
    Indeed, democratic republics have historically shown vulnerability to despotic movements. However, one brand of idealism is still functionally equivalent to another. =3 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WeVWupFBkA8 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WeVWupFBkA8
rayiner 2y ago
I’m as pro-vaccine as they come. But if you didn’t want anti-vaxxers you shouldn’t have done “racism is a public health issue.” https://www.npr.org/2021/04/08/985524494/cdc-director-declares-racism-a-serious-public-health-threat https://www.npr.org/2021/04/08/985524494/cdc-director-declar.... Or exemptions to social distancing for protests but not churches: https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2020/06/04/public-health-protests-301534 https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2020/06/04/public-hea.... Ideologically-captured institutions shredded their scientific credibility and now we’re all suffering for it.
- tptacek 2y ago
  So you're not as pro-vaccine as they come, because if you were, you'd be pro-vaccine even after other vaccine advocates did dumb stuff. People are always going to do dumb stuff, so invoking those dumb things as a defense for bad policy is just a way of revealing the softness of your original commitment.
  - rayiner 2y ago
    [flagged]
    - tptacek 2y ago
      So, in wanting to "wipe out" the "current generation" of scientists, you're in fact pretty far from as "pro-vaccine" as they come --- like, significantly farther than the median American. That's fine, let's just make sure our premises are all aligned.
      - binding_problem 2y ago
        It's actually very much not "fine" to want to "wipe out" an entire generation of a nation's scientists and replace them with ones that fit your ideological preferences.
        tptacek 2y ago
rickandmortyy 2y ago
science used to say non white folk were scientifically dumb lol
cmurf 2y ago
Why does it need to be a foreign enemy? Could be domestic enemies. Replace it by necessity with a CEO-dictator. Isn't that the Yarvin, Thiel, Musk playbook? "Americans ... have to get over their dictatorphobia"

ujkhsjkdhf234 2y ago

> It's baffling to imagine why this is happening unless those in control are actually actively working on foreign orders to weaken the US and its future. This is exactly what is happening. I feel like people have to be deliberating ignoring all the evidence that Elon and Trump are foreign assets at this point. It has been obvious for years and only more obvious with time.

jfengel 2y ago
As insane as all of this is, I still have a hard time believing that they're foreign assets. They are doing what Trump was elected to do. The voters aren't Russian assets. Certainly the Russians have been doing their best to dis-inform the voters, but that doesn't need to come from the top. And they are largely doing it by parroting the standard Republican talking points for the last four decades. The Russians are, at most, exacerbating what they already wanted to believe. If anything, that's worse. They're not assets. They're doing this because they're genuine believers.
- epistasis 2y ago
  But where do those voters get their beliefs? Who controls their information space, and who is injecting ideas? This is classic Russian strategy all over the world, and they are experts at the psychology and how to control parts of the population through division of that population. This might in fact be the only innovation that Russia can claim since the fall of the USSR: complete mastery of the technology of propaganda for controlling populations.
  - rayiner 2y ago
    > But where do those voters get their beliefs? Conservatives have been threatening to drown the federal government in the bathtub since the 1980s. There’s no new beliefs. It’s just a reshuffling between the parties of the same folks that existed in 1990: paleocons and social conservatives, capitalists, neocons, nationalists, economic populists, etc. The anti-vaxxers were there, they were just democrats because that was the low-institutional-trust party back then. The people you’re calling “Russian agents” were also there in the 1990s, as were the neocons calling them that. They just took over the GOP because it turned out that the Democrats (back then) were correct and american military intervention in places Iowans can’t find in a map is actually bad for the GOP base.
    - scrollaway 2y ago
      It’s only true out of convenience. Russian propaganda latched onto various divisive talking points and pushed them to the extremes. I’m old enough to remember conservative republicans from 2008 ish era and while there was some dumb stuff, anything 2016 and beyond is unparalleled and its revisionist to say otherwise. The American public got slowly acclimated to turning into a ridiculous version of idiocracy. A mix of corrupt / easily bought politicians, a voter base addicted to consumerism and social media, and a country with a problematic voting system, all contributed to todays situation. I used to wonder, like many kids, “why didn’t anyone stop hitler, he was so obviously bad”. It was never that obvious to me that so many other indoctrinated people could have been just as awful and far gone. I pray those smart enough to see where all of this is inevitably leading to, leave the US before it’s too late for them to. Do not become an unwilling contributor to what the US does next.
      - silverquiet 2y ago
        > I’m old enough to remember conservative republicans from 2008 ish era and while there was some dumb stuff, anything 2016 and beyond is unparalleled and its revisionist to say otherwise. "Idiocracy" came out in 2006, and Carl Sagan was writing about American anti-intellectualism long before that. I'd also note that 2008 brought us Sarah Palin on the Republican ticket. I agree things were better, but the rot was clear to some already.
- watwut 2y ago
  It is funny how Trump was elected to destroy America, but also if you blame republican voters you are unfair, because they supposedly had no idea. Trump was elected to raise inflation, make markets unstable, waste money on conspiracy theory research?
- hayst4ck 2y ago
  Why do politicians ask for money? Because money influences votes. How does money influence votes? Money pays for private intelligence companies, PR firms, think tanks, and social media influence. What does this mean? It means that politicians are influencing the voter base, rather than the voter base influence politicians. What is the corollary of all this? A foreign government can influence American voters either via more direct means (such as running a private intelligence company) or indirect means (offering resources in exchange for favors). Is there precedent? Yes. America institutes regime change in other countries in many ways. France funded and offered aid to the pre-american rebellion against British rule resulting in the formation of a new state. At some point people stop being individual actors and become statistics. It might be even more correct to say people are in A/B testing groups and there are engineers literally experimenting on these groups to achieve an outcome for the purposes of whoever paid them.
- tzs 2y ago
  > As insane as all of this is, I still have a hard time believing that they're foreign assets. They are doing what Trump was elected to do. I don't recall most of the things going on now coming up during the campaign, so I don't see how you can conclude he was elected to do them. He was elected to do the things that he spent 95% of his campaign time on.
dartos 2y ago
The best argument I’ve seen in favor of your position is “If they were working with foreign powers to weaken the US, what would they be doing differently”
nosianu 2y ago
I don't believe it. Everything they did and achieved required a huge organization and a lot of influential sponsors. It should raise even more alarms how thus far every single critic of them even inside their own party was silenced or actually joined them! I don't believe in threats as explanation on that scale. Many of those people are themselves well connected and influential. I fear there is something deeper going on, and we will only find out by watching. I hate this narrative that concentrates on Trump, or even Musk. Neither would be where they are now with a huge amount of active support. Whatever is happening is coming from inside the US. They may also be working together with foreign actors, but they act according to their own interests.
- ujkhsjkdhf234 2y ago
  Billionaires are pooling their resources to chop the US into network states. That is what is happening.

Joel_Mckay 2y ago

"US is setting their entire science infrastructure on fire" Dubious journals created to serve political narratives are common in every country ( https://beallslist.net/ https://beallslist.net/ .) Throw enough money at any issue, and one may engineer influence in public media outlets just like any regular Ad/Review spot. It is not a new phenomena, have a wonderful day =3

sanktanglia 2y ago
Except alot more is happening in America then just dubious journals like mass firing of scientists and experts
- Joel_Mckay 2y ago
  Indeed, democratic republics have historically shown vulnerability to despotic movements. However, one brand of idealism is still functionally equivalent to another. =3 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WeVWupFBkA8 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WeVWupFBkA8

rayiner 2y ago

I’m as pro-vaccine as they come. But if you didn’t want anti-vaxxers you shouldn’t have done “racism is a public health issue.” https://www.npr.org/2021/04/08/985524494/cdc-director-declares-racism-a-serious-public-health-threat https://www.npr.org/2021/04/08/985524494/cdc-director-declar.... Or exemptions to social distancing for protests but not churches: https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2020/06/04/public-health-protests-301534 https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2020/06/04/public-hea.... Ideologically-captured institutions shredded their scientific credibility and now we’re all suffering for it.

tptacek 2y ago
So you're not as pro-vaccine as they come, because if you were, you'd be pro-vaccine even after other vaccine advocates did dumb stuff. People are always going to do dumb stuff, so invoking those dumb things as a defense for bad policy is just a way of revealing the softness of your original commitment.
- rayiner 2y ago
  [flagged]
  - tptacek 2y ago
    So, in wanting to "wipe out" the "current generation" of scientists, you're in fact pretty far from as "pro-vaccine" as they come --- like, significantly farther than the median American. That's fine, let's just make sure our premises are all aligned.
    - binding_problem 2y ago
      It's actually very much not "fine" to want to "wipe out" an entire generation of a nation's scientists and replace them with ones that fit your ideological preferences.
      - tptacek 2y ago

rickandmortyy 2y ago

science used to say non white folk were scientifically dumb lol

cmurf 2y ago

Why does it need to be a foreign enemy? Could be domestic enemies. Replace it by necessity with a CEO-dictator. Isn't that the Yarvin, Thiel, Musk playbook? "Americans ... have to get over their dictatorphobia"