4 ms·
Falcon 9 was a more conservative rocket. The big new thing was recovering the booster, and there were lots of failures for that. The other big difference is tha
by ianburrell 2y ago
Falcon 9 was a more conservative rocket. The big new thing was recovering the booster, and there were lots of failures for that. The other big difference is that Falcon 9 uses the Merlin engine, which was developed on Falcon 1 rocket which had multiple failures.
Starship is trying something new, recovering the second stage that goes in orbit. Which means bigger rocket and more complicated second stage. They are also using new Raptor engines.
The last two failures have been new version of Starship, and they either broke something or haven't been able to fix problem.
- Zigurd 2y agoBack in the day, falcon nine booster reusability would've been called a fine hack. It wasn't meant to do that. But, just barely, it could. Starship is the cybertruck of spaceships. It's what happens when you stop listening to the people who could pull off a fine hack.