3 ms·
> ensure systems are designed to never let it happen again Though that may be the right response in many scenarios, sometimes it's better to just accept the ri
by vanviegen 2y ago
> ensure systems are designed to never let it happen again
Though that may be the right response in many scenarios, sometimes it's better to just accept the risk of it happening again, as the preventative measure may be worse than the disease. Especially when considering the combined, stifling effect of a historically accumulated wealth of such measures.
- stego-tech 2y ago> sometimes it's better to just accept the risk of it happening again, as the preventative measure may be worse than the disease I mean, while this is an important consideration to have, I fear that all too often it's used as an excuse to ignore the issue altogether until a later date, especially by management. Prevention doesn't necessarily mean the issue is prevented from recurring, but that the outcome is prevented. It could be building a self-healing check that intervenes on a given symptom to auto-repair a known fault. It could be firing off a warning that this issue will happen again soon, so whoever is on call isn't caught by surprise. It could be shunting a known outage into a specific maintenance window, so customers don't notice it. Prevention is ideal, sure, but sometimes the best you can do is a preemptive response.