> I'm curious why they don't mention being a Lisp in their page though, perhaps it's not a "real" lisp? Maybe to avoid some of the zealots who refuse to call C

> I'm curious why they don't mention being a Lisp in their page though, perhaps it's not a "real" lisp? Maybe to avoid some of the zealots who refuse to call Clojure et al "lisps" since they're missing cons, X, Y and so on. I remember reading somewhere in a GitHub issue or PR that the author/maintainer also calls Janet "lisp-like" rather than "a lisp", fwiw.