4 ms·
I think rules as a concept are kinda under attack. This ranks really below my radar on shit to care about in the current situation. Is there a steelmanned argu
by lovich 2y ago
I think rules as a concept are kinda under attack. This ranks really below my radar on shit to care about in the current situation.
Is there a steelmanned argument on why this matters for anyone atm?
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- Ardren 2y agoReading the comments HN in general, you wouldn't think anything else was under attack.
- bryanlarsen 2y ago100,000 American deaths per year due to poor air quality.
- lovich 2y agoWhat’s that as a percentage of population? This is a technology forum, we are all aware of the law of large numbers. Is (100,000) an acceptable rate or note
- bryanlarsen 2y agoThere are 3.3 million deaths annually in the US. So 3% of deaths are due to air pollution. That's a very large number.
- idrathernot 2y agoHow many deaths would there have been if people did not have access to the technologies that create air pollution? If every CO2/pollution emitting device (cars, power plants, metal production, food processing, coal mines, etc) were all to be shuttered or massively cut back at once, deaths would increase substantially more. Yeah air pollution is bad but I think the solution needs to be incentive/reward based rather than punitive.
- bryanlarsen 2y agoThe rules discussed in the article are not anywhere close to your straw man.