> First strike from a rogue state is basically nuclear terrorism Obviously by definition someone can attack first, however: “First strike capability is a coun

> First strike from a rogue state is basically nuclear terrorism Obviously by definition someone can attack first, however: “First strike capability is a country's ability to defeat another nuclear power by destroying its arsenal to the point where the attacking country can survive the weakened retaliation while the opposing side is left unable to continue war.” https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_strike_(nuclear_strategy) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_strike_(nuclear_strategy... So yes in theory sure a first strike would take out nuclear silos, but neither side believed they could preform a successful first strike. It’s a theoretical goal, not something that seems to have been possible barring the very early days of the Cold War before ICBM’s existed. Which then brings up the question of what exactly you target if you assume thousands of nukes will hit you regardless of what you aim for.