3 ms·
> Good argument. It applies to murder and mass genocide as well. All those people killed during the holocaust? They are dead so they don’t feel anything anymore
by prmoustache 2y ago
> Good argument. It applies to murder and mass genocide as well. All those people killed during the holocaust? They are dead so they don’t feel anything anymore. I don’t see what the problem is.
Are you comparing people who took a decision to end their life with people who never asked to be killed?
> Plenty of stories of people getting treated and plenty of stories of people who lost their desire to suicide.
Getting treated != healed.
- ninetyninenine 2y ago>Are you comparing people who took a decision to end their life with people who never asked to be killed? No I am not. I am saying your logic is invalid because it DOES apply to people who never asked to be killed. If you USE your logic to justify euthansia, then I'm saying it's invalid because that argument can justify murder as well. >Getting treated != healed. So you're saying people can never be healed through treatment? I think we have a bigger societal problem here. Psychologists and doctors have no reason to exist in this world because their entire job is treatment and treatment doesn't heal people. We should concentrate on solving that problem first. To honest, you can't respond to a complex statement with a simple one liner argument that completely mischaracterizes what's going on. You = wrong.