3 ms·
Oh I apologize for inconvenience. Not really. Not sure why you’re expecting me to dig through the sites and ads networks that don’t use differentiating techniq
by wruza 2y ago
Oh I apologize for inconvenience.
Not really. Not sure why you’re expecting me to dig through the sites and ads networks that don’t use differentiating techniques too often due to basically non-existing ubol userbase to this date. We’ll see how it goes in just a few months, I guess. I’ll be baffled if this fuzz was really about user security and not pushing ads down the throats. I’m also expecting to see more ads on mobile safari for it becoming compatible with the new widespread ad vulnerability.
- kennysoona 2y agoYou were referring to ad banners that Lite supposedly cannot block. I'm just asking for an example. If you encounter them sufficiently frequently that they are a problem, you should encounter one over the next 14 days while this discussion is open and be able to share the link. If you can't, then either there is no evidence of the problem you assert exists, or the problem occurs so infrequently as to be of negligible concern.
- LiamPowell 2y agoUBO has 39M users on Chrome while UBOL has 2M, that doesn't seem non-existent. AdBlock and AdBlock Plus also both have slightly more than UBO and have both been using Manifest V3 for a while.