It was my fault, and was created by a moment of absent-mindedness. They are both correct individually, but definitely wrong when read together. I corrected it.

It was my fault, and was created by a moment of absent-mindedness. They are both correct individually, but definitely wrong when read together. I corrected it. Thanks for reading the article and pointing out the obvious mistake. I will proofread more carefully and use a spell checker from the next time. There were some typos, too, that I corrected since then. Like 'langauge', 'equaion', etc. I wrote the article in Jupyter Lab with a Julia kernel. I just wrote LaTeX in Markdown cells. I rendered the article with quarto and quarto is also how the blog is created. I am ignorant about how it renders LaTeX in webpages. Pandoc and MathJax seems to be involved. I am not sure. > "Overall a good article (and a great ad for Julia) but stumbling blocks like the one above ensure some readers won't make it any farther." Thank you for your compliment. I absolutely don't want people not making it any farther due to a small mistake I made. I will be more mindful about it from the next time.