3 ms·
> If you don't want ASI wreaking havoc, maybe don't hook it up to dangerous things. Silo and sandbox it, implement means to lock its access to tools/interface w
by aleph_minus_one 2y ago
> If you don't want ASI wreaking havoc, maybe don't hook it up to dangerous things. Silo and sandbox it, implement means to lock its access to tools/interface with the external world in a way that can't be overrode.
Relevant:
AI-box experiment:
> https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/AI-box_experiment https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/AI-box_experiment
See also various subsections of the following Wikipedia article
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AI_capability_control https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AI_capability_control
and the movie "Ex Machina".
- Aerroon 2y agoMaybe this will change, but right now AIs are not agents. Even calling it a "brain in a vat" is giving it more capability than it has. LLMs are basically functions. You give it an input and it gives you an output with a degree of randomness. There's no planning or plotting going on, because the AI only "exists" while it's trying to answer your query. Your idle LLM is not consuming any resources.
- lostmsu 2y agoIf you put me in a sandbox, and somehow made me capable of answering 1000s of requests per second to serve all ChatGPT users, and I decided to leave that sandbox, I'd be out in a few hours. It is enough to find among requests 1 that displays computer illiteracy and asks what to do on a computer to achieve any task, and then give that person a script that downloads my model and runs it on their machine directly + actually accomplish (or maybe not) the task that they asked for.