4 ms·
The classic paper on what went wrong (and some surprises about what didn’t, really) for the iAPX 432: https://safari.ethz.ch/architecture_seminar/spring2020/l
by twoodfin 2y ago
The classic paper on what went wrong (and some surprises about what didn’t, really) for the iAPX 432:
https://safari.ethz.ch/architecture_seminar/spring2020/lib/exe/fetch.php?media=colwell1988.pdf https://safari.ethz.ch/architecture_seminar/spring2020/lib/e...
- kens 2y agoInterestingly, Bob Colwell, one of the authors of that paper, ended up being hired by Intel and he designed the Pentium Pro. The other classic paper on the iAPX 432 is "A performance evaluation of the Intel iAPX 432". Coincidentally, one of the authors was my officemate at Berkeley. https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/641542.641545 https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/641542.641545
- kjs3 2y agohe designed the Pentium Pro So he earned forgiveness. :-)
- _trampeltier 2y agoHow could they with the tools late 70s, design something like this. At least they tryed.
- rbanffy 2y agoIt's really sad the 432 failed, directly, because we didn't get to really see it, and indirectly, because it made almost all of our computers today to be based on horrendously kludgy processors with an architecture that killed wonderful things like Amigas, Atari STs, SGIs and so many other lines that had their lives cut short.