> None of the systems you listed will protect against an 80% majority wanting to force through specific legislation Close to impossible to say without consider

> None of the systems you listed will protect against an 80% majority wanting to force through specific legislation Close to impossible to say without consideration of specific implementations of the exemplary sub-frameworks proposed. > a more fleshed out example A John Rawls like framework of common best interest in not appointing beasts, coupled with criteria to discriminate beasts? The point is not about providing a detailed solution here, but in pointing in a direction beyond simple, lacking forms of democracy, suboptimal in theory and in results. If you have naïve processes in place, faults will eventually show: the system must become resistant. A large number of possible improvements can be considered: the point remains that they must be studied - this has never been the "end of history", if only because in too many systems the fool and the bright have similar impact. And I need to say: like in all systems, checking what went wrong, why it went wrong, and implementing solutions so that it will not go wrong again.