3 ms·
Well, there is still NATO. Because the US are unreliable doesn't mean that the other members of NATO are? Genuinely asking.
by palata 2y ago
Well, there is still NATO. Because the US are unreliable doesn't mean that the other members of NATO are? Genuinely asking.
- JumpCrisscross 2y ago> there is still NATO For conventional war, probably. For nuclear, will Paris risk its homeland for Latvia?
- palata 2y agoRight. So the question is: given that NATO is now a lot weaker because of the US, it's not clear whether the promises of mutual defence still hold. Do I understand that correctly?