3 ms·
Well, I don't think it should be allowed because it basically defeats the purpose of a lottery, but, as Matt points out in his article, I think a better way to
by hn_throwaway_99 2y ago
Well, I don't think it should be allowed because it basically defeats the purpose of a lottery, but, as Matt points out in his article, I think a better way to prevent it is to make it easier.
If it becomes super easy to purchase millions of lottery tickets, then any arbitrageur would likely be dissuaded because the risk of someone else doing it (and having to share the winnings) go up by a ton. You could still have collusion, but that should be enforceable by laws against collusion I'd hope.
It this case there were rules to prevent arbitrage that were basically just not enforced by the lottery commission, and that's really the only reason this was possible.
- patja 2y agoI'm curious what you define as the purpose of a state lottery. The Texas lottery's mission is to generate revenue for the state. Are you arguing this is counter to the purpose because the net revenue will be diminished by the certain expense of the payoff?