2 ms·
I stand corrected, thank you. The evidence is not unequivocal, and that itself is suspicious.
by sshine 2y ago
I stand corrected, thank you.
The evidence is not unequivocal, and that itself is suspicious.
- eesmith 2y agoThe Geneva Conventions have a very high bar for when suspicion can justify action. Article 22, for example, has: > The following conditions shall not be considered as depriving a medical unit or establishment of the protection guaranteed by Article 19: > 1. That the personnel of the unit or establishment are armed, and that they use the arms in their own defence, or in that of the wounded and sick in their charge. > 2. That in the absence of armed orderlies, the unit or establishment is protected by a picket or by sentries or by an escort. > 3. That small arms and ammunition taken from the wounded and sick and not yet handed to the proper service, are found in the unit or establishment What evidence are you equivocating over?