2 ms·
It's not a directly mappable to a register-based microprocessor but it's directly mappable to a stack-based microprocessor. e.g. The PSC 1000 microprocessor (1
by tabony 2y ago
It's not a directly mappable to a register-based microprocessor but it's directly mappable to a stack-based microprocessor.
e.g. The PSC 1000 microprocessor (1994) could run Java directly:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ignite_(microprocessor) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ignite_(microprocessor)
Stack-based microprocessors tend to perform worse than register-based ones and I assume there wasn't a huge reason to develop a Java-on-chip for a "Java computer.” (1) It would have not run non-Java software easily and (2) the future of stack-based microprocessors wasn't as bright.
- sillywalk 2y agoSun also produced the MAJC[0] (Microprocessor Architecture for Java Computing) processor, a VLIW design. It was only used in one of Sun's graphic boards. [0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MAJC https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MAJC