> Most natural language arguments are not sound because the argument is not deductive logic. Most natural language arguments are persuasive, not formal reasonin

> Most natural language arguments are not sound because the argument is not deductive logic. Most natural language arguments are persuasive, not formal reasoning related notes that there is some evidence that "Language is primarily a tool for communication rather than thought" [1]. ie, that language is neither necessary nor sufficient for the so-called psychic thinking process. It serves as a communication mechanism. Meanwhile, there is a hypothesis that the psychic thinking process lies beyond computation as we know it [2] in the form of turing machines etc. [1] https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-024-07522-w https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-024-07522-w [2] https://www.amazon.com/Emperors-New-Mind-Concerning-Computers/dp/0192861980 https://www.amazon.com/Emperors-New-Mind-Concerning-Computer...