3 ms·
In other words, you're in the 50% of the population who don't get unsolicited d*ck photos sent to them. But do consider that the other 50% may have significantl
by tetromino_ 2y ago
In other words, you're in the 50% of the population who don't get unsolicited d*ck photos sent to them. But do consider that the other 50% may have significantly different preferences on this matter, and that those preferences may drive tech company product decisions.
- Y_Y 2y agoWhat population are you talking about that a full half of them get sent {deck,dick,dock,duck,dyck} photos?
- theandrewbailey 2y agoI don't follow your logic. How would one's membership in a big tech ecosystem determine whether they get unsolicited pics? Or whether they feel they can jump out of those ecosystems? > But do consider that the other 50% may have significantly different preferences on this matter Or am I reading it the wrong way? 50% of people want to get those pics? That's either news to me, or I run in different circles than you do. Either way, I don't feel that I'm evangelizing about it, I'm not telling everyone that they should do what I'm doing. I'm merely telling my experiences and what I've done.
- mos_basik 2y ago@tetromino_ is expressing a prior that women are sent dick pics more frequently than men. From that they infer that women might actually like a feature that blurs out dicks automatically (at least, more than men would). From that they infer that your expressed dislike of that feature means it's likely you're a man. From that they infer that you're not used to thinking like a woman, and encourage you to try doing that to see if you think it makes Google's actions make more sense. (now, the real question - did I get "whooosh"ed, or did you?) EDIT: To be honest, I don't particularly like the sarcasm of @tetromino_'s comment and I don't think your original comment deserved a response like that. But seeing two responses apparently totally miss @tetromino_'s point was too much for me to ignore.