> unauthorised access and unauthorised alteration of a computer system (which I gather to be judged criminal in UK & USA at least). I doubt it would ever be pr

> unauthorised access and unauthorised alteration of a computer system (which I gather to be judged criminal in UK & USA at least). I doubt it would ever be prosecuted. It is important to remember that the law doesn’t mean what you think it means, it means what the average prosecutor and/or judge thinks it means. Those laws were invented for use against scary “hackers”, not printer manufacturers updating their own products