Dang I thought this was going to be a throwback (2013) article about Digg's post-v4 relaunch [0] by Betaworks. > The new Digg has little in common with the old

Dang I thought this was going to be a throwback (2013) article about Digg's post-v4 relaunch [0] by Betaworks. > The new Digg has little in common with the old site: it has big photos instead of tiny text, does not allow for comments, and most importantly, it depends on human editors in addition to an algorithm that weighs user voting. So far, people seem to like it. A new survey, this time with 2,600 users, showed that 81 percent would recommend the new Digg to a friend. One thing I remember about this phase was how good the headlines were, they must have paid a decent sum for human editors. [0] https://www.theverge.com/2013/2/4/3950596/diggs-traffic-rebounds-after-relaunch-but-users-remain-on-the https://www.theverge.com/2013/2/4/3950596/diggs-traffic-rebo...