5 ms·
Netflix has 26 million streaming subscribers (via Mashable in April http://mashable.com/2012/04/23/netflix-26m-subscribers/ http://mashable.com/2012/04/23/netfl
by NoPiece 14y ago
Netflix has 26 million streaming subscribers (via Mashable in April http://mashable.com/2012/04/23/netflix-26m-subscribers/ http://mashable.com/2012/04/23/netflix-26m-subscribers/), HBO has 29 million cable subscribers (via wikipedia - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HBO http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HBO)
The streaming space may not be as profitable for HBO, but I don't think it is a problem that there aren't many of us that would want it standalone.
- Steko 14y agoThere's really no telling how many Netflix people also have cable. I'm guessing a lot. In my state, 95% of the population has cable and I'm guessing a fair number of the other 5% are poor, ok with just broadcast or don't even have a tv (or watch it) for various reasons. Sure there's some like me but what 1%? Nationwide the number with cable is closer to 88%-90% I think but we're still talking 1-3% for cord cutters of which only a fraction are going to be paying for HBO.
- NoPiece 14y agoI agree most Netflix users probably have cable, and won't cut cable until there is a critical mass of content available online. I do think there is a tipping point not that far off, and when it happens the businesses that are already well established online like Netflix are best positioned to reap the rewards. HBO can position itself in resistance to the change, but risk being caught flat footed when it happens.
- Steko 14y ago"businesses that are already well established online like Netflix are best positioned to reap the rewards" Netflix is in a tight spot where in some delivery schemes they are an extra middleman that could end up being unneeded. Content -> Netflix -> Apple -> Users can very quickly collapse to Content -> Apple -> Users. So if the sea change comes from a wildly popular new Apple Smart TV that's bad news for Netflix. The same thing is going to be true if the cable companies manage to transfer their current cable monopoly to content on demand. The "best positioned businesses" are probably the content producers because Content -> Users is realistic long term model. Which is why Netflix is ramping up their own content (Lillehammer, House of Cards, Arrested Development...). That said even traditional content is under attack from all corners -- YouTube is commonly cited but there's also traditional console gaming, social apps, the social gaming apps, etc. In a few years I think we'll see more and more content startups based around animation-on-the-cheap tools like the forthcoming Source Filmmaker or NME (Taiwan Animated News). You could probably do a startup today that filled a cable channel with South Park quality original animation. Yes, that's very limited graphically but the competition (very low fee cable channels) is pretty godawful.
- NoPiece 14y agoContent producers are positioned well in theory, but in reality are ill equipped to compete because their whole business is build around old dying models. See how the majors in the music industry have fared. It is near impossible for big media companies to make major business shifts - they just don't have the culture to support it. Also, I'm not sure I'd call them content producers; they are more content financiers and distributors. Control of distribution is probably their main competitive advantage, which may be why they feel so threatened by the idea of shifting to the internet.