4 ms·
A 486DX and a 487? I thought the 487 was only useful for the SX chips? ...looked it up, apparently the standard 487 was a full 486DX that disabled and replaced
by antod 2y ago
A 486DX and a 487? I thought the 487 was only useful for the SX chips?
...looked it up, apparently the standard 487 was a full 486DX that disabled and replaced the original 486SX. Was this some sort of other unusually awesome coprocessor I hadn't heard of?
- 486sx33 2y agoDoubled throughput of certain calculations in certain tasks if motherboard supported it Possibly something software like maple could take advantage of
- jakedata 2y agoThe 486sx had a 16 bit external bus interface so it could work with 386 chipsets. The DX processors had a full 32 bit bus and correspondingly better throughput. The 486 never included an integrated FPU, you had to add a separate co-processor for that. I could go on about clock multipliers and base frequencies but I'll spare you.
- bluedino 2y agoI think you're thinking of the 486SLC The 486SX was fully 32-bit (unlike the SLC and 386SX) and the 486DX had the integrated FPU, and the 487 was a drop in 486DX which disabled the 486SX
- fabiensanglard 2y agoExactly. I got scammed on my first PC when they sold me a 486 for the price of a 386. It was too good to be true. I later learned that the 486 was an SLC. Per say, a 386 with some internal cache from Cyrix (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cyrix_Cx486SLC https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cyrix_Cx486SLC).
- Narishma 2y agoYou're wrong. The 486SX had a 32-bit bus, just like the DX version. The difference between them is that the DX had an integrated FPU while the SX had it disabled and you had to add a separate 487 co-processor.
- hollandheese 2y agoYou are thinking of the 386. You perfectly describe the situation on the 386 not the 486. The 386SX had a 16 bit external bus interface so it could work with 286 chipsets. The DX processors had a full 32 bit bus and correspondingly better throughput. The 386 never included an integrated FPU, you had to add a separate co-processor for that.
- jakedata 2y agoYa, I slept on it and realized I skipped a generation in my mind. I guess the details of one of the PCs I built 35 years ago fade after a while.
- cantrecallmypwd 2y agoThe 486DX had an FPU. It was the 486SX that lacked it. The "FPU" upgrade for a 486SX was a entire special version of the 486DX that disabled the original 486SX entirely.
- cantrecallmypwd 2y agoDoesn't make any sense, perhaps it's AI-generated nonsense. There was a DX4 100 but no such thing as a "DX3". The 486 included an FPU so there'd be no reason to have a "487" which was a complete replacement for the 486SX chips. There were Pentium Overdrives but those were CPU replacements on the 486DX.