> which works perfectly well in the 99% case. Not without its related traits and whatnot. Without those you have the same all the same problems the Go proposal

> which works perfectly well in the 99% case. Not without its related traits and whatnot. Without those you have the same all the same problems the Go proposals keep running into. Trouble is that it is not yet clear what the Go equivalent is to those related features. However, the attempts to figure that out keep coming. Ian Lance Taylor (of generics fame) recently implemented the latest proposal to try it out, although it seems it too has failed, but suggests that things are inching closer to something usable when the initial details were able stand up to basic scrutiny. Nothing has "won" yet.