Sure, but I would argue that those are concepts that have existed for millennia and has real material grounding in reality. Whereas intellectual property is en

Sure, but I would argue that those are concepts that have existed for millennia and has real material grounding in reality. Whereas intellectual property is entirely a fictional construction. At its core, owning property involves the ability to use force to assert your control over it. This is completely impossible with ideas (and information more broadly) since they're non-physical, so it's not really property in the way real world property like land is. So because it's not reflective of how the material world works, that's the heart of the contradiction I alluded to in my previous comment. There is no way to resolve the problem of LLMs from within the logical framework that doesn't lead to some further counterintuitive result. There has to be legislation around it if we want to keep the charade going, or ideally we'd want to drop it altogether.