3 ms·
? https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43252629 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43252629 was entirely about "ownership" not being relevant
by yjftsjthsd-h 2y ago
?
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43252629 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43252629 was entirely about "ownership" not being relevant
- chownie 2y agoWas it? That comment is constituted from two quotes, one of them entirely fabricated, and then a hypothetical provided with no basis. If Mozilla don't own the data and their license only allows Firefox to do what you're requesting it do, then I don't see what points are being made except fearmongering.
- yjftsjthsd-h 2y agoYes, it was. If you want to argue that Mozilla won't/can't use data except for serving user requests, then by all means argue that, but pointing out that they don't own the data is moving the goalposts because you're doing so under a comment that talks about ownership being more or less irrelevant.