3 ms·
Maybe they mean that it either doesn’t matter in context or it’s easy to catch and correct. Either way it seems reasonable to trust the judgement of the profess
by beng-nl 2y ago
Maybe they mean that it either doesn’t matter in context or it’s easy to catch and correct. Either way it seems reasonable to trust the judgement of the professional reporting on their experience with a new tool.
- stvltvs 2y agoI worry that we'll get complacent and not check details like that when they are important, not just the medical field but everywhere.
- bluefirebrand 2y agoYes, I think this is likely The OP says there aren't many hallucinations, but I think that observation is almost impossible to verify. It relies on the person making it to have a very strong ability to notice hallucinations when they happen Most people do not have the attention to detail to really spot inaccuracies consistently. Even when someone is very good at this normally all it takes is being overtired or stressed or distracted and the rate of misses will go way up I trust coworkers to write good code more than I trust them to do good code review, because review is arguably a harder skill Similarly, I think reviewing ML output is harder than creating your own things, and I think relying on them in this way is going to be disastrous until they are more trustworthy
- visarga 2y ago> I worry that we'll get complacent and not check details like that when they are important, not just the medical field but everywhere. The performance level goes up all the time, it won't be this bad for long.
- namaria 2y agohttps://xkcd.com/605/ https://xkcd.com/605/
- johnisgood 2y agoIf it is easy to catch and correct, why cannot Copilot do it? Sounds like something that it should know.
- hulitu 2y agoLike with every Microsoft product, the testing is done by the user.