3 ms·

how many companies will actually adopt 3FS now that it's open source? not a hater, just know that theres a lot of hurdles to adoption even if something if open

• huntaub 2y ago
  For example, in AWS, you can get a similar FSx for Lustre file system for just 11% more cost, which could be worth it to avoid the management costs of running your own storage cluster.
• skeeter2020 2y ago
  to me this seems to target a pretty small audience: very big data and specific problem domains, you need killer devops chops, expensive & specialized infrastructure and a desire to build out on bleeding edge architecture. I'd suspect most with these characteristics will stick with what they've got, "medium Big Data" companies should probably go with hsoted services and the rest of use stick with a single node DuckDB.
  • 0cf8612b2e1e 2y ago
    Bingo. Very few organizations have petabytes of data on which they are trying to efficiently process for machine learning. Such organizations already have personnel and technology in place offering some kind of solution. Maybe this is an improvement, but it is quite unlikely to be offering new capabilities to such teams.
    • datadrivenangel 2y ago
      And the organizations that get large enough to be sad with DuckDB performance will have options like MotherDuck for cloud hosting