3 ms·
FSF Use Microsoft Word and Docx to Submit Its Amicus Brief
- raverbashing 2y agoLiterally nobody cares Lawyers will use whatever tool they know best for their job. And protip, LibreOffice is rarely that
- theandrewbailey 2y agoThey must have used MS Office because Libreoffice doesn't save in DOCX. Oh wait https://www.libreoffice.org/discover/libreoffice/ https://www.libreoffice.org/discover/libreoffice/ A DOCX file alone isn't enough evidence that MS Office was used.
- egberts1 2y agoMany archiac court systems still demand filings in MS-Word. The export features in Libreword is pretty good. https://help.libreoffice.org/25.2/en-US/search?P=Docx&DEFAULTOP=or&xFILTERS=.%7E%7E https://help.libreoffice.org/25.2/en-US/search?P=Docx&DEFAUL...
- taylodl 2y agoWhat a garbage "article." From the garbage pile: "Could the FSF not find any law firm that, in addition to talking about or for Free software, does not use .NET, OOXML, and almost everything Microsoft? Even in 2025?" One, no you cannot. Lawyers live in the world of Microsoft Office. Two, one does not choose a law firm based off the tools they use.
- malicka 2y agoPar for the course with Techrights, unfortunately.
- tiahura 2y agoThe federal system, and every state ecf system I’ve seen, requires PDF. I’ve tried Star / Open / Libre Office every year since 9x. They still aren’t as robust as Word 6 for Windows 3.1 released 35 years ago.
- snvzz 2y agoFSF has never been opposed to using privative software when there's no alternative. Presumably, compatibility concerns forced them to.
- acefaceZ 2y agoExactly - the court system does not accept PDFs generated by most open source tools. Pretty crazy. Adobe and Microsoft must love that.
- acefaceZ 2y agoIf you are familiar with pacer or ACMS - it is an old antiquated system. You can’t submit PDFs for example generated from anything other than Adobe Acrobat or exported from Microsoft word.