4 ms·
if that were truly (sustainably) possible, I'd support it, but imo that'd just be signing ff's death warrant side note, thunderbird is already independent and
by bjord 2y ago
if that were truly (sustainably) possible, I'd support it, but imo that'd just be signing ff's death warrant
side note, thunderbird is already independent and democratically-managed by the community (as of a few years ago). the way I understand it is that they effectively just use mozilla's resources for legal, logistical stuff
- BSDobelix 2y ago>if that were truly (sustainably) possible, I'd support it, but imo that'd just be signing ff's death warrant I really don't think so, have a look at the ladybird browser: https://ladybird.org/#sponsors https://ladybird.org/#sponsors Or even Servo: https://servo.org/ https://servo.org/
- chownie 2y agoNeither of these represent the cost and support footprint to maintain and develop a fully featured browser because as it stands neither of them are fully featured, complete browsers.
- BSDobelix 2y ago>cost and support footprint to maintain and develop a fully featured browser True because the real cost to support a "a fully featured browser" is at least a 1/4 billion dollars....because OpenSource needs to make money, not for the Dev's but the MBA's ;)