3 ms·
You got brainwashed https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/IF/IF12503/1 https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/IF/IF12503/1 "1982 U.S.-PRC Joint Com
by WhereIsTheTruth 2y ago
You got brainwashed
https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/IF/IF12503/1 https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/IF/IF12503/1
"1982 U.S.-PRC Joint Communiqué/Six Assurances
As they negotiated establishment of diplomatic relations, the U.S. and PRC governments agreed to set aside the contentious issue of U.S. arms sales to Taiwan. They took up that issue in the 1982 August 17 Communiqué, in which the PRC states “a fundamental policy of striving for peaceful reunification” with Taiwan, and the U.S. government states it “understands and appreciates” that policy. The U.S. government states in the 1982 communiqué that with those statements “in mind,” “it does not seek to carry out a long-term policy of arms sales to Taiwan,” and “intends gradually to reduce its sale of arms to Taiwan, leading, over a period of time, to a final resolution.” The U.S. government also declares “no intention” of “pursuing a policy of ‘two Chinas,’” meaning the PRC and the ROC, “or ‘one China, one Taiwan.’”"
- drodgers 2y agoI don't see how the commenter is 'brainwashed'. The One China Policy was and remains a convenient status quo for all parties. The risk is that China decides that it's newfound economic and military might have changed that calculus.
- WhereIsTheTruth 2y agoYeah, now a open question, what's worse: - reuniting with China - getting your only industry stolen by the USA Quick, you have less than 5 years to answer
- UberFly 2y agoReuniting with China.
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]