> > Fifth, the U.S. should indemnify every model created on U.S.-manufactured chips against any copyright violations, with the caveat that the data used to trai

> > Fifth, the U.S. should indemnify every model created on U.S.-manufactured chips against any copyright violations, with the caveat that the data used to train the model must be made freely available. One of these things is not like the others. Isn't that a massive giveaway to a relatively small number of model makers, at the cost of the huge number of copyright holders, including international copyright agreements? If this was legislation, I would assume that someone bribed and/or horse-traded for it to be tacked on.