5 ms·
I'd have to disagree -- the lack of OS-level sandboxing primitives such as seccomp-bpf and SELinux[1] means that exploits happen rather regularly in iOS rather
by supriyo-biswas 2y ago
I'd have to disagree -- the lack of OS-level sandboxing primitives such as seccomp-bpf and SELinux[1] means that exploits happen rather regularly in iOS rather often ([2], among others).
[1] https://source.android.com/docs/security/app-sandbox#protections https://source.android.com/docs/security/app-sandbox#protect...
[2] https://www.csoonline.com/article/3811322/iphone-users-targeted-in-apples-first-zero-day-exploit-in-2025.html https://www.csoonline.com/article/3811322/iphone-users-targe...
- nullpoint420 2y agoDoes the Apple Sandbox[1] not count? What about TrustedBSD[2] and the MAC (Mandatory Access Control) subsystem introduced as part of SEDarwin[3]? [1] https://www.ise.io/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/apple-sandbox.pdf https://www.ise.io/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/apple-sandbox.... [2] http://www.trustedbsd.org/mac.html http://www.trustedbsd.org/mac.html [3] http://www.trustedbsd.org/sedarwin.html http://www.trustedbsd.org/sedarwin.html
- ggm 2y agoNot to deny that, but it didn't (for example) break the Secure Enclave. Key exfiltration didn't happen AFAIK.
- saagarjha 2y agoiOS has a perfectly good sandboxing model that is literally called "the sandbox". You will note that the impact of that bug is limited to the process it is triggered in for precisely this reason.