4 ms·

> The CDC website was gutted in Jan 2025 I trust that this is true, but a cursory browsing through 2024 outbreaks, for example, shows the same information. To

> The CDC website was gutted in Jan 2025 I trust that this is true, but a cursory browsing through 2024 outbreaks, for example, shows the same information. To your parent poster's point, it would be nice to have a damning example like "look at this thing that was taken down." Maybe such examples belong somewhere else, but it might help dissuade skeptics.

apical_dendrite 2y ago
Please see pages 6 to 12 in this declaration from the court case for examples of what was taken down. Note that Judge Bates issued a temporary restraining order to the CDC to restore these websites, so it shouldn't look different (except that the CDC put a ridiculous disclaimer on some of the pages) https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/69608613/6/1/doctors-for-america-v-office-of-personnel-management/ https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/69608613/6/1/doctors-fo... [edit - fixed link]
- MathMonkeyMan 2y ago
  Thanks. That document is four pages. Where is the "Memorandum of Law in Support of the Motion for a Restraining Order" referred to at the beginning? edit: - “The Youth Risk Behavioral Surveillance System” - “Data and Statistics” for “Adolescent and School Health” - “The Social Vulnerability Index” - “The Environmental Justice Index” - “PrEP for the Prevention of HIV Infection in the U.S.: 2021 Guideline Summary” - “HIV Monitoring” - “Getting Tested for HIV” - “National ART Surveillance System (NASS)” - “CDC Contraceptive Guidance for Health Care Providers” - FDA webpages on “Study of Sex Differences in the Clinical Evaluation of Medical Products” - “Diversity Action Plans to Improve Enrollment of Participants from Underrepresented Populations in Clinical Studies” [1]: https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.dcd.277069/gov.uscourts.dcd.277069.6.2.pdf https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.dcd.277...
  - phonon 2y ago
    I think it's within Document 6 (Feb 6) https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/69608613/doctors-for-america-v-office-of-personnel-management/ https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/69608613/doctors-for-am...
  - apical_dendrite 2y ago
    Apologies. I've fixed the link.

apical_dendrite 2y ago

Please see pages 6 to 12 in this declaration from the court case for examples of what was taken down. Note that Judge Bates issued a temporary restraining order to the CDC to restore these websites, so it shouldn't look different (except that the CDC put a ridiculous disclaimer on some of the pages) https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/69608613/6/1/doctors-for-america-v-office-of-personnel-management/ https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/69608613/6/1/doctors-fo... [edit - fixed link]

MathMonkeyMan 2y ago
Thanks. That document is four pages. Where is the "Memorandum of Law in Support of the Motion for a Restraining Order" referred to at the beginning? edit: - “The Youth Risk Behavioral Surveillance System” - “Data and Statistics” for “Adolescent and School Health” - “The Social Vulnerability Index” - “The Environmental Justice Index” - “PrEP for the Prevention of HIV Infection in the U.S.: 2021 Guideline Summary” - “HIV Monitoring” - “Getting Tested for HIV” - “National ART Surveillance System (NASS)” - “CDC Contraceptive Guidance for Health Care Providers” - FDA webpages on “Study of Sex Differences in the Clinical Evaluation of Medical Products” - “Diversity Action Plans to Improve Enrollment of Participants from Underrepresented Populations in Clinical Studies” [1]: https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.dcd.277069/gov.uscourts.dcd.277069.6.2.pdf https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.dcd.277...
- phonon 2y ago
  I think it's within Document 6 (Feb 6) https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/69608613/doctors-for-america-v-office-of-personnel-management/ https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/69608613/doctors-for-am...
- apical_dendrite 2y ago
  Apologies. I've fixed the link.