3 ms·
For the record https://www.fincen.gov/sites/default/files/shared/Corporate_Transparency_Act.pdf https://www.fincen.gov/sites/default/files/shared/Corporate_...
by throwaway5752 2y ago
For the record https://www.fincen.gov/sites/default/files/shared/Corporate_Transparency_Act.pdf https://www.fincen.gov/sites/default/files/shared/Corporate_...
It is the sense of Congress that—
(1) more than 2,000,000 corporations and limited liability
companies are being formed under the laws of the States each
year;
(2) most or all States do not require information about
the beneficial owners of the corporations, limited liability
companies, or other similar entities formed under the laws
of the State;
(3) malign actors seek to conceal their ownership of corporations, limited liability companies, or other similar entities in
the United States to facilitate illicit activity, including money
laundering, the financing of terrorism, proliferation financing,
serious tax fraud, human and drug trafficking, counterfeiting,
piracy, securities fraud, financial fraud, and acts of foreign
corruption, harming the national security interests of the
United States and allies of the United States;
(4) money launderers and others involved in commercial
activity intentionally conduct transactions through corporate
structures in order to evade detection, and may layer such
structures, much like Russian nesting ‘‘Matryoshka’’ dolls,
across various secretive jurisdictions such that each time an
investigator obtains ownership records for a domestic or foreign
entity, the newly identified entity is yet another corporate
entity, necessitating a repeat of the same process;
(5) Federal legislation providing for the collection of beneficial ownership information for corporations, limited liability
companies, or other similar entities formed under the laws
of the States is needed to—
(A) set a clear, Federal standard for incorporation practices;
(B) protect vital Unites States national security
interests;
(C) protect interstate and foreign commerce;
(D) better enable critical national security, intelligence,
and law enforcement efforts to counter money laundering,
the financing of terrorism, and other illicit activity; and
(E) bring the United States into compliance with international anti-money laundering and countering the
financing of terrorism standards;
(6) beneficial ownership information collected under the
amendments made by this title is sensitive information and
will be directly available only to authorized government authorities, subject to effective safeguards and controls, to
(A) facilitate important national security, intelligence,
and law enforcement activities; and
(B) confirm beneficial ownership information provided
to financial institutions to facilitate the compliance of the
financial institutions with anti-money laundering, countering the financing of terrorism, and customer due diligence requirements under applicable law;
(7) consistent with applicable law, the Secretary of the
Treasury shall—
(A) maintain the information described in paragraph
(1) in a secure, nonpublic database, using information security methods and techniques that are appropriate to protect
nonclassified information systems at the highest security
level; and
(B) take all steps, including regular auditing, to ensure
that government authorities accessing beneficial ownership
information do so only for authorized purposes consistent
with this title; and
(8) in prescribing regulations to provide for the reporting
of beneficial ownership information, the Secretary shall, to
the greatest extent practicable consistent with the purposes
of this title—
(A) seek to minimize burdens on reporting companies
associated with the collection of beneficial ownership
information;
(B) provide clarity to reporting companies concerning
the identification of their beneficial owners; and
(C) collect information in a form and manner that
is reasonably designed to generate a database that is highly
useful to national security, intelligence, and law enforcement agencies and Federal functional regulators.
Today is a massive victory for criminals.
- nullc 2y ago[flagged]
- _DeadFred_ 2y agoFYI I was informed combing through peoples posting history is a big rule violation here. Your response should speak to the current comments/position not attack posters.
- JumpCrisscross 2y ago> I was informed combing through peoples posting history is a big rule violation here Not OP, but I don’t know if that’s universally true. It’s available, after all. It seems to be fair to identify trolls. (I’ve personally been thankful for people pointing out my personal hypocrisy blind spots)
- barbazoo 2y agoDoesn't say that in the guidelines. Also why is there a /threads page then if one isn't supposed to use it to look at someone's comments?
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- throwaway5752 2y agoI don't think that is the case, and I didn't care that the parent poster did so. The guidelines are succinct, you can confirm this https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html I think the harm from doing that, however, is you can make a mistaken conclusion on limited information and personalize something. Doing so can make you run afoul of Please don't post shallow dismissals, especially of other people's work. A good critical comment teaches us something. or Please respond to the strongest plausible interpretation of what someone says, not a weaker one that's easier to criticize. Assume good faith. So in good faith reply, nullc, I think I am reacting appropriately to the situation and even though you could describe these in ways that seem similar in common language, they scenarios are very different.